Saturday, December 25, 2010

Merry Christmas Again!

You can’t say it often enough. I said it the other day, and now I say it again. “The PC Police” can take it and stick it. This day is dedicated to the birth of Jesus Christ, whether or not you believe in him. It’s the religion of Christians, and reference to it should NEVER “offend” anyone. I am not offended by reference to the symbols of other religions, and I should not be. And members of other religions should not be “offended” by references to someone else’s. Especially Muslims, whose “Holy Book” tells them to KILL anybody who does not believe exactly the same way they do. Today’s Christianity does not, even if they can find an obscure passage in the Old Testament that might be read in such a way that some people might think it does. In any case, it is not a “guiding principle” to Christians. Some non-Christians seem to think they can stop Christians from making reference to their religion by wishing people “Merry Christmas” on this day. They’re wrong, even if some liberal courts disagree. They misread the Constitution to say that government and religion should be separate. That’s wrong. There is NOTHING in the Constitution saying that. So I say again, “Merry Christmas to all!” No matter what your religion. This will be the only post today, as I will be spending time with my family. (Just common sense)

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Merry Christmas Everybody!

Some people are “offended” by the words, “Merry Christmas." They can go to hell. I will not accede to the demands of the “PC Police” and say “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.” Why should I care if atheists, some Jews, Islamics, and followers of other religions don’t like it when I wish them a Merry Christmas? This is a country FOUNDED by Christians and, in which most powerful posts are still held by people who at least SAY they’re Christians. If that offends some people, too bad! I don’t care. Most Jews don’t “get offended” by it, and they don’t try and kill Christianity in a Christian country. So I say, “Merry Christmas,” people, and anybody who gets “offended” by this can go to hell. (The Blaze)

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Take Kids Because of "Oath Keepers"

The “child protectors” have done it again! They’ve taken a man’s children because he was a member of the “Oath Keepers,” an organization that insists that government employees KEEP the oaths they took. What the hell is wrong with that:? The “child protectors” will use ANYTHING they can to support their unconstitutional and illegal “taking” of people’s children. They falsely told my own mother the wrong date for a hearing on taking my own children more than 30 years ago after I dutifully showed up at hearing after hearing, only to have it postponed. They had NOTHING they could show against me, but used the fact I didn’t show up for that last hearing as an excuse to take my two boys, anyway. I haven’t seen, nor spoken to them since, even though I was found guilty of NOTHING. They LIED, then took my children, for NO REASON. Is it any wonder I hate the very ground these evil people walk on? (Oath Keepers)

Thursday, October 28, 2010

"Recovered Memories"

This is one of the most pernicious scams ever to be perpetrated upon people, and it is perpetrated by the “child protectors.” Some “psychologists” put SUGGESTIONS into children’s heads that they have been abused and/or sexually abused by parents or friends of the family. Most of these “recovered memories” are false, or at least questionable and should not be seen in court as “testimony.” They should be treated as what they are: questionable, maybe SOLICITED “memories” that may or may not be true. But that’s not how they’re treated by the “child abusers—er, uh, protectors.” They are treated, in their “captive courts,” as “prima facie evidence” of abuse.. This should not be allowed. (Robert Shepherd)

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Is "Oath Keepers" A Militia?

Not at all. All they do is insist the people who are SUPPOSED to be protecting us KEEP the oath they took to uphold the Constitution of the United States. Nothing more. They SAY they have been known to buy deadly weapons, among them a rifle, handgun, and a taser. First of all, the purchase of a weapon is a right GUARANTEED by the Constitution; second, a “taser” is NOT a “deadly weapon. It is a Trade Mark of ONE company that makes and sells stun guns. This shows the sloppiness with which these people write their “legal documents.” Third, this is not the first time a child has been taken with spurious reasons that are “upheld” by the “captive courts” of the “child protectors.” It has happened many times, and will happen many times again. They will decide what organizations are “subversive” whether or not it is true. They will LABEL such organizations with spurious accusations and call them what they are NOT, such as “a militia.” (Oath Keepers)

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Okay To Spank Kids?

Yes. In spite of insidious propaganda like this, spanking your kids early in life is NECESSARY to convince them you WILL do it. I did it, and usually did not have to use corporal punishment on my kids later in life because they KNEW I’d do it. Today, kids who know their parents will not spank them run wild because they have been taught that all they have to do it threaten to “turn their parents in” to the “child protectors” if they feel (in their infinite wisdom) that they’re being abused. Today they teach parents NOT to spank them and when they (predictably) get in trouble, they want to blame the parents. I’m sure you’ve heard “authorities” talking about “punishing the parents” of obstreperous kids when it was “the authorities” who destroyed the parents’ ability to control them with their faulty teachings. (Soda Head)

Friday, January 08, 2010

Judge Dictates Religion

“Do you think judges should have the power to decide what religion your children must belong to and which churches they may be prohibited from attending? We have long suspected that family courts are the most dictatorial and biased of all U.S. courts, routinely depriving divorced fathers of due process rights and authority over their own children, but this December a Chicago judge went beyond the pale. Cook County Circuit Judge Edward Jordan issued a restraining order to prohibit Joseph Reyes from taking his 3-year-old daughter to any non-Jewish religious activities because the ex-wife argued that would contribute to "the emotional detriment of the child." Mrs. Rebecca Reyes wants to raise her daughter in the Jewish religion, and the judge sided with the mother.” So what else is new? Judges making unconstitutional rulings, especially in “family court” is not new at all. They do it every day and defendants, who don’t have nearly as much money behind them as do the “family services,” can’t “make a Constitutional case out of it.” So they get away with it. What we need is a bunch of lawyers to take these cases on a “pro-bono” basis, so they can’t continue to get away with it. (Phyllis Schlafley) Thanks to Carl spitzer for bringing this to my attention.

Friday, January 01, 2010

Not Fit for Kennedy's Seat?

What could make a person not fit to replace Teddy Kennedy? Who could do worse things than Teddy did in his lifetime? Maybe keeping a clearly innocent man in prison to advance her own career is one. What is there about this Senate seat that requires people of such low character to fill it? Massachusetts is famous for the villainous nature of its elected officials and its “witch hunts.” Mass. burned many innocent women many years ago, calling them “witches.” Later witch hunts involved imagined child sex abuse, which she gaily perpetrated. To be later named a Senator to replace one of the most villainous senators ever seems likely. (Ann Coulter)